Trademarking logos that contain words

Business people love their company logos. Often, it is the first marketing effort made on the road to success. It’s important to understand the different scopes of trademark protection available. For instance, how is a word treated differently than an artistic design?

The Trademark Office refers to those “logos” that are made of words & a design as composite marks. When a trademark application is Made, the USPTO must read through (examine) the application. It is determining whether the proposed trademark should issue based on a myriad of factors. One common reason for denying an application is because the proposed mark is very similar to someone else’s. The USPTO does not want the registered trademark to create a “likelihood of confusion” among consumers. (15 U.S.C. §1052(d)).

In its examination, a first question of the USPTO how similar is your mark to other trademarks. When evaluating a composite mark for similarity to others, the word portion is normally given greater weight. This is because the words are likely to make a greater impression upon consumers, be remembered by them, and be used by them to refer to or request your product. (In re Aquitaine Wine USA, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1181, 1184 (TTAB 2018). So, although the USPTO must compare marks in their entireties, the word portion is considered the dominant feature and is accorded greater weight in determining whether marks are confusingly similar, even where the word portion has been disclaimed. (Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation’s Foodservice, Inc., 710 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1983)).

It is advisable, if you are thinking about trademarking your logo, consider separating the artistic element from the words that are in your logo as well. Similar to how the company markets this famous logo.

How Amazon® Displays its Products

Amazon sellers are often confronted with notices of infringement from other sellers in the Amazon marketplace. For that reason, it is important to understand how Amazon shows products for sale on its website.

Each and every product sold on Amazon has a single "product detail page". The product will also have what is called an Amazon Standard Identification Number, known as its "ASIN". When someone looks thru Amazon for a certain product, they are directed to that product's detail page.

As understood by Amazon sellers, this product detail page is the homepage for that product and describes its specifications. Importantly, this homepage will also show the sellers that offer the product. Remember that ASIN?

Now, to sell a product that is already sold elsewhere on Amazon, a seller must match its offering to an existing ASIN and its accompanying product detail page. Amazon DOES NOT ALLOW sellers to create a new ASIN for a product that is already being sold on Amazon. This raises the question – “who controls the information placed on a details page?”

Amazon determines what information is included on a product detail page based on seller input. But, there is no guarantee that the information provided by a seller will appear on that page. Particularly if the product is not new to Amazon.

When multiple sellers are offering the same product, the detail page defaults to one seller's offering. Amazon refers to this default offering as the "Buy Box." The product's detail page will say that the product is "sold by" whichever seller is in the Buy Box at that time. What about other sellers?

Other sellers’ offerings are available under the page's links to "New & Used from" or "Other Sellers on Amazon." Per Amazon’s policy, only professional sellers who meet certain performance-based requirements are eligible for placement in the Buy Box. If multiple sellers are eligible, it is awarded to the best performer.

It is unclear whether Amazon checks the accuracy of info on a product's detail page. It seems that Amazon chooses the information to include via an automated process.

Amazon does not notify the sellers of a given product when it changes information on the product detail page. Lawsuits over the ill effects of this system are difficult for a seller to win. So, it is far more effective to comply with Amazon’s policies, including its IP Policy (more on this in another posting). See for example New Age Imps., Inc. v. VD Imps., Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165653 (C.D. Cal. July 18, 2019).

Making things more beautiful - is that patentable?

Inventors make things to solve problems. Making water cleaner, cars faster, appliances smarter. Such problems solved, and the inventions that solve them, can be granted a patent. But, sometimes the problem does not seem so, well, problematic.

For instance, can an invention be patented if it merely causes something to be more beautiful?

One lock company seems to think so. In fact, this week an Indiana inventor was granted United States Patent No. 10,794,082 for a door handle using a chambered light source for illuminating a door with a pattern - it makes the door itself more beautiful too.

The inventor felt that door handles include lights merely to give information related to the status of the door, e.g. “opened” or “closed”. These old doorknobs fail at enhancing “the overall aesthetic of the door or the handle.”

So, this Indiana inventor made a doorknob that “includes a shell having a front side and a rear side” and “a light source” which is placed inside an ”internal chamber.” This way a “pattern is positioned on the rear side of the shell” via a semi-clear piece projecting a pretty little pattern onto the door.

Now that is beautiful!